Monday, March 11, 2013

New Study Reveals Which Authors Have Ignored Women Most


Share1

Homepage Image: William Shakespeare
Hulton Archive/Getty Images
The English poet and dramatist, William Shakespeare (1564 - 1616), circa 1610.
The survey was conducted by Ben Schmidt, a graduate student at Princeton who studies intellectual history (and the brilliant mind behind Prochronisms, a site that examines the time-period-appropriateness of language used in movies and TV). Schmidt’s blog “Sapping Attention” focuses on “text mining and digital humanities”: he scans texts for elements that can tell us something about the context, rather than just the content, of the work. For his most recent post, Schmidt examined works by some of the most well-respected “canonic” authors—the top 100 whose work is in the Bookworm database of 19th-century literature—to determine how many times they used male versus female pronouns, cross-referenced against the author’s gender.

What did he find? Charles Haddon Spurgeon, a 19th-century British preacher, used nearly 20 male pronouns for each female one, the most unbalanced ratio on the list. On the other end of the spectrum, Jane Austen had about three female per male. But the chart—nicely presented at Schmidt’s site—is not even on both sides. Shakespeare is presented as the average, but his work contains about three male per female. Austen is one of only four authors to use more female than male. Almost every writer who refers to females more frequently is a woman. To generalize, women wrote about women and men, but there were more male writers and they mostly wrote about men—which means women’s stories are disproportionately excluded from the literature we respect the most.

In addition, the women who do write are often restricted to less well-respected library shelves. When Schmidt breaks it down by genre, we see that the pronouns can indicate more than just to whom the author is referring:

Read more: http://entertainment.time.com/2013/03/08/new-study-reveals-which-authors-have-ignored-women-most/#ixzz2NBHXvffr

No comments: