Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Can the chains provide us with better small bookstores?
Posted by Mike Shatzkin on November 8, 2009 on his blog · Under General Trade Publishing, New Models, Publishing, Publishing History, Supply-Chain


There is considerable concern among the trade publishing establishment about the future of brick-and-mortar stores. As well there should be. Retail stores provide the most efficient promotion opportunities for books: putting them in front of people poised to buy. They give clear signals about sales appeal by positioning and piles of stock of varying sizes; they make it possible to “look inside” of illustrated books in ways that no online presentation can match; they enable discovery through serendipity; and they put more different book choices in front of any person faster and more efficiently than any web page or smart phone screen possibly can.

But they’re troubled. Same store sales, or what the Brits call “like-for-like”, have been declining. That may be partly due to the recession, but it is also due to factors that won’t go away: shifts of sales to the Internet, to ebooks, and perhaps to substitutes in other media and the Web.

The magic that grew Barnes & Noble and Borders into behemoths was large store size and title selection. My first experience with this effect was a lesson from my father, Leonard Shatzkin. He took over executive responsibility for the Brentano’s bookstore chain as a vice-president of Crowell-Collier (later called Macmillan, a company subsequently bought by Simon & Schuster and not connected to the company now called Macmillan) in the early 1960s. The store in that chain that was doing least well was in Short Hills, New Jersey. They doubled the number of titles the store carried and it soon was the best-performing store in the chain.

But the “size as a magnet” concept took a back seat to mall store expansion by Walden and B. Dalton in the 1970s. As shopping centers were built across the country, the mall developers favored national chains, which were “bankable”, for their leases. Walden and Dalton rode that wave and added hundreds of stores. Meanwhile, partly assisted by the expanding wholesaling services offered by Ingram, independent stores thrived and grew their title selections beyond what the space-challenged mall stores could offer.

In the late 1980s, Bookstop, a discount chain in Texas, pioneered the “superstore” concept: a massive selection of 100,000 or more titles under one roof. This was the Brentano’s Short Hills effect writ large. By that time, Borders and Barnes & Noble, which already had larger stores than the mall stores, had bought Walden and B. Dalton, respectively, giving them critical mass to support robust central operations and provide leverage in their relationships with publishers. The new superstore concept suited Wall Street, and the two big chains were bankrolled to roll out superstores nationwide.

This was great for everybody except some of the larger independents which, up to that time, had the large title selection field to themselves. For publishers, it meant lots of additional shelf space for their backlist. For consumers, it meant a large increase in choice at hundreds of locations around the country. The attraction of 100,000 or more titles under one roof was compelling; these superstores didn’t need malls to bring them traffic. They were destinations worth traveling to on their own.

But then came the Internet, and Amazon. As we used to remind ourselves quite often ten years ago, “the Internet changes everything.”
To read the rest of this long and thoughtful piece, and the useful commenyts it has drawn link here to Mike Shatzkin's blog.

1 comment:

Keith Mockett said...

What planet is this guy living on? Claiming that physical bookstores are better for serendipitous discovery is just plain wrong. Searching online, be it Amazon or Fishpond (in NZ), or the library catalogue (new titles, subject matter) gives you a much greater chance of discovery of different titles than appear on a booksellers shelf. And online reviews suggesting other authors/titles points you in new directions. That's certainly my experience.

Also, in the comments there is discussion about used books and somehow trying to get revenue from their resale back to the author. I'm sure it's a hot topic for some but this desire to regulate and exploit this business defies logic. Used book stores and libraries support the new book trade, they don't diminish it. These make discovery of new authors, genres etc a lower risk than new book sales. Otherwise many people won't take the risk and won't discover. Once discovered they are likely to buy something new. Again, that is my experience.